After a recount in Georgia, questions were raised about the legitimacy of the US Presidential Election 2020.
According to reports, the recount revealed a few discrepancies in relation to absentee ballots as well as their legitimacy.
Federalist reports, shortly after November’s election, Mark Davis (the president of Data Productions Inc., who is described as an expert on voting data analytics), obtained data from the National Change of Address database. This data identifies Georgians who confirmed that they were served by the US Postal Service.
The Federalist reported: “After excluding moves with effective dates within 30 days of the general election, and by using data available from the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office, Davis identified nearly 35,000 Georgia voters who indicated they had moved from one Georgia county to another, but then voted in the 2020 general election in the county from which they had moved”.
Davis stated that temporary relocations under Georgia law do not affect a citizen’s residency status nor render their votes inadmissible. However, as The Federalist points out the margins put Biden’s and Trump’s results under review.
“Approximately one-third of the votes at issue could have altered the outcome of the election,” The Federalist alleges. “Yet the media, the courts, and the Secretary of State’s Office ignored or downplayed the issue.”
Federalist Reports:
According to the Federalist, Davis ran the data. He found that over 10300 Georgians had updated their voter registration information after they reported that 35,000 Georgians said that they moved from one Georgia county to another in more than 30 days prior to November.
An analyst discovered that these same people also cast ballots in countries where they lived before the election.
Jake Evans, a Georgia lawyer who was able to overturn two Georgia elections successfully, stated that he agree with Davis’ findings. The Federalist explained that an election should be rescheduled if (1) more votes were invalid, rejected, or irregular than the final count, or (2) if there are systemic irregularities that cast doubt on the results.
