The Democrats’ conspiracy theory linking Russia to former President Trump has been debunked.
According to the CIA, evidence given by Michael Sussmann, Clinton’s campaign lawyer, was not technically credible, according to special counsel John Durham.
Durham Says CIA Determined Data From Former Clinton Lawyer Was ‘User-Created,’ Not ‘Technically Plausible’ https://t.co/1zoWxXXh6m via @dailycaller
— Winterkills # 2 (@dcpurcellgeorge) April 17, 2022
Durham responded to Sussmann’s objections to the type of material that could be introduced in Clinton’s lawyer’s trial in a court document on Friday.
The lawyer will be on trial for lying to the FBI next month. He claimed to the FBI that he did not attend the meeting where he was there on behalf of Clinton’s campaign.
Durham stated in February that the government will prove that the Hillary Clinton campaign used data containing DNS traffic that was modified on purpose.
The Clinton team used this material to conduct a smear campaign against Trump, attempting to link the previous president to Russia.
Newly published letter from Durham's office reveals that Sussmann failed to provide records to *his own law firm*. Concealed materials include incriminating text message to the FBI.
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) April 15, 2022
Durham: "the defendant had "knowledge" that his electronic communications would incriminate him" pic.twitter.com/kahskghFcv
Sussman, on the other hand, protested the data collection, prompting Durham to file a court motion on Friday. This data collection, according to Durham, was a factual backdrop against Hillary’s campaign.
Durham accused Sussman of lying to former FBI general counsel James Baker two months before the 2016 presidential election.
Sussman originally delivered the data and white papers to Hillary’s campaign in an attempt to establish a relationship between Trump and Alfa Bank, which has ties to Russia, during the meeting where he said he was absent.
In addition, Durham indicated that Sussman gave a new set of charges against Trump to a government agency other than the FBI.
In his submission, Durham indicated that the government intends to submit evidence demonstrating that the FBI and CIA stated Sussman’s allegations were inaccurate.
The special counsel also revealed a previously unknown link between the anti-Trump dossier and Sussman, who claimed Trump had ties to the Russian government.
This dossier was written by Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer, and sponsored by Fusion GPS, an opposition research organization.
Sussman entered a not guilty plea and requested that the case be dismissed, which the court had already rejected.
